<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microdocumentaries, Steve Palumbi and ocean acidification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climateshifts.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climateshifts.org/?p=3179</link>
	<description>A blog about science, climate change, politics, coral reefs, and the environment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:38:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Greer</title>
		<link>http://www.climateshifts.org/?p=3179&#038;cpage=1#comment-3121</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Greer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateshifts.org/?p=3179#comment-3121</guid>
		<description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://scholars-stage.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Scholar&#039;s Stage&lt;/a&gt; has linked to this post. 


&lt;a href=&quot;http://scholars-stage.blogspot.com/2009/10/ocean-acidification-real-carbon-problem.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;...For those unfamiliar with the topic I recommend this short 5 minute &#039;micromentary.&#039; The gist is this...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://scholars-stage.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Scholar&#8217;s Stage</a> has linked to this post. </p>
<p><a href="http://scholars-stage.blogspot.com/2009/10/ocean-acidification-real-carbon-problem.html" rel="nofollow">&#8230;For those unfamiliar with the topic I recommend this short 5 minute &#8216;micromentary.&#8217; The gist is this&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.climateshifts.org/?p=3179&#038;cpage=1#comment-2930</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateshifts.org/?p=3179#comment-2930</guid>
		<description>Hey OveHG,

What is the pH of vinegar? (2.4) Of the ocean?  (7.8-8.3) WikiPedia (noting the editorial control of the AGW editor) reckons this: Between 1751 and 1994 surface ocean pH is estimated to have decreased from approximately 8.179 to 8.104 (a change of −0.075). pH is a log scale. 8.1 - 2.4 = 5.7 or this demo uses acid that is ~10^6 stronger than sea water. That is some speeding up. It is also a pretty crude simplification of carbon chemistry in the ocean. While I appreciate the intention is to warn folk about potential risks etc. We now live in a read/write web space and simplifying what is a complex system to dissolving a piece of coral in vinegar is, IMHO, not good science education.

There are two issues it seems to me. The empirical evidence about pH change in various oceans (please don&#039;t tell me there is a global average!). I&#039;d be more interested to know what the pH shifts are around the Barrier Reef. The 2nd is how are the projections of pH change (e.g. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2005/July/01070501.asp&quot; title=&quot;Raven&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; arrived at? Please don&#039;t tell me a computer model! 

I appreciate the need to simplify things so folk can get a sense of the argument but this, at least to me, is not a good way to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey OveHG,</p>
<p>What is the pH of vinegar? (2.4) Of the ocean?  (7.8-8.3) WikiPedia (noting the editorial control of the AGW editor) reckons this: Between 1751 and 1994 surface ocean pH is estimated to have decreased from approximately 8.179 to 8.104 (a change of −0.075). pH is a log scale. 8.1 &#8211; 2.4 = 5.7 or this demo uses acid that is ~10^6 stronger than sea water. That is some speeding up. It is also a pretty crude simplification of carbon chemistry in the ocean. While I appreciate the intention is to warn folk about potential risks etc. We now live in a read/write web space and simplifying what is a complex system to dissolving a piece of coral in vinegar is, IMHO, not good science education.</p>
<p>There are two issues it seems to me. The empirical evidence about pH change in various oceans (please don&#8217;t tell me there is a global average!). I&#8217;d be more interested to know what the pH shifts are around the Barrier Reef. The 2nd is how are the projections of pH change (e.g. <a href="http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2005/July/01070501.asp" title="Raven" rel="nofollow"> arrived at? Please don&#8217;t tell me a computer model! </p>
<p>I appreciate the need to simplify things so folk can get a sense of the argument but this, at least to me, is not a good way to do it.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
