Secondly public statements by IPCC are so qualified with caveats to require telepathy to parse the real meanings.
Finally compared to my reading of the latest science the IPCC is woefully out of date and conservative to a fault.
In my view much of the criticism of the IPCC is misdirected.]]>
David Karoly braved the online questions afterwards. Live chat transcript.
Forehead slapping stuff. But one of the best analogies Ive seen yet on why Co2 is an issue, where he invokes the image of a bathtub with equal amounts of water going in & out. The adding 3% to the intake, but none to the outlet.
You tube video on Stephen Schneider on the skeptics.
On an unrelated issue. Did anyone see Bjorn Lomborg come to the other side?
“IPCC reports that global warming is human driven remain unchalenged, althought some revision of report writing processes is recommended.”
Can’t we just stick to the fundamental message here!
Sorry, I’m just a bit tired of the poor reflection of the true science in the media (even spills over onto the ABC).