As for Dr Curry … all well and good but why have the independent investigations of Mann come to very different conclusions?]]>
McIntyre and Ross McKittrick were not out to victimise Michael Mann – they requested his data which is perfectly acceptable scientific practice – they became suspicious when Mann refused to pass it on. When he was eventually forced to produce it it was found to be faulty as Professor Muller points out clearly in the video I posted above.
Dr Judith Curry and the various leading scientists who regularly visit her blog also came to the obvious conclusion that Mann was corrupt because he was prepared to corrupt his science to reach his desired conclusion. Read the damn blog Ove – not one scientist is prepared to defend Mann in this regard. Maybe you should come forward and publish Mann’s defence – good luck.]]>
Re: me. Millions of dollars of taxpayers money? That sounds like you’re calling me corrupt. Are you?]]>
His exposure of Mann was not mythology or fundamentalist rhetoric – it was real science and if you can’t see the fraud then you haven’t been following it and aren’t qualified to comment.
In fact it’s highly likely that you are in receipt of big oil funding due to the donations to your University from Fossil Fuel companies!]]>
The fact that he’s willing to accuse other scientists of wrongdoing based on a situation that he hasn’t taken the time to try to comprehend says a lot about his science and principles.]]>
even your new mate Professor Muller doesn’t approve of it.
says more about your science and principles Ove if you want to defend Mann.]]>
I hope the court throws the book at Ball.]]>