This is one of Peter Sinclair’s best videos.  It does a fabulous job of explaining the science behind the issue and debunking the skeptic argument.  He addresses what has for some time been a favorite page in the skeptic playbook: the bogus argument that AGW is refuted by the fact that at the termination of recent ice ages, increases in temperature initially lag behind increases in CO2.  This argument is a straw man; nobody is denying that this patterns occurs.  But this observation, and the fact that temperature can indeed have strong effects on CO2 conc., in no way undercuts the science behind AGW.   The simple explanation for this is that we know that many other factors influence global temperature.  And ice ages are thought to be controlled by Milankovitch cycles and not by changes in atmospheric CO2.  That doesn’t mean that CO2 does not also influence global temperature or that it isn’t the major driver of recently observed global warming.

IOW as John Cook pokes fun at this illogical argument:  ”Chickens do not lay eggs, because they have been observed to hatch from them”.

There are better written explanations of this issue by far more knowledgeable people than me here and here.  And Peter’s video is a great place to start:

 

4 Responses to Climate Denial crock of the Week: "Temp leads Carbon"

  1. David Horton says:

    This is an excellent series, thanks Peter, and John.

  2. I guess this means that you agree that when Al Gore presented that HUGE chart of CO2 and temperature, and suggested, based on that chart, that CO2 drives temperature, he was wrong.

    In which case, I’d have thought it would have been a good idea to correct that huge misleading conclusion, as I suspect many people still think that CO2 drives temperature based on what Al Gore said.

  3. increases in temperature initially lag behind increases in CO2

    Isn’t that backwards ?

  4. J.Roff says:

    Hey Steve,

    Sorry, but the CO2 / temperature lag discussion has been discussed countless occasions already. Start with this one from back in 2007:

    http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/04/the-lag-between-temp-and-co2/ (The lag between temperature and CO2. [Gore’s got it right.])

    See also:

    http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature.htm
    http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2004/12/co2-in-ice-cores/
    http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11659

    As I said in the other post – can you suggest a peer reviewed journal article that shows that CO2 doesn’t drive temperature?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.