A climate storm for investors
By Paul Gilding | July 12th, 2010 | Category: Cockatoo Chronicles
Beware the coming climate storm. A moment is approaching when science and markets will collide, but then merge, with chilling consequences for investors who miss the moment, and great excitement for those who are well prepared.
The signs are all around us now. Signs that a storm of climate action will soon rage through the economy, sweeping away denial and, along with it, those companies, politicians, investors and industries that aren’t ready.
Signs like our past two Prime Ministers and opposition leaders in Australia being removed with climate change a central issue in their downfalls. Signs like 2008 being the first year when the money invested globally in new renewable energy generation projects was greater than that invested in new fossil fuel energy generation. Signs like the last decade being the hottest on record, as of course each decade has been since 1980. Signs like the first new car company IPO in the USA for half a century being a disruptive electric car company.
There is great investment and excitement now in renewables, with over $100 billion invested in 2008 and the same in 2009, despite the uncertain financial climate. Yet we see growth in coalmines, new coal export facilities and a lack of action in politics in Australia and the US. What is an investor to do with such confusing signals?
Simple. Observe the science, because the science drives everything else.
The facts are now very straightforward on the problem and its causes, as stated by the peak US science body The National Academies of Sciences. They said last month the science of climate change is in the category of those theories that had “been so thoroughly examined and tested, and supported by so many independent observations and results, that their likelihood of subsequently being found to be wrong is vanishingly small. Such conclusions and theories are then regarded as settled facts.”
So this is not a philosophy or a political viewpoint. These are facts. Smart investors deal in rational analysis, not ideological perspectives or wishful thinking. As US Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan said “Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
So if you believe in facts, you will be understand that science will, in the end, overcome resistance and denial, as argued by Professor Stephan Lewandowsky from the University of Western Australia: “The laws of physics will relentlessly assert themselves, unswayed by public opinion, political shenanigans, or elections. Ultimately, the laws of physics will speak so loudly that no amount of wishful thinking can prevent them from being heard.”
The reason we can be so confident that this storm, when it hits, will be ferocious and effective at driving change, is by considering what happens when science meets markets. The science dictates that when we act it will now have to be dramatic action.
We know that to avoid catastrophic risk we must keep warming below two degrees and, as a result, this is the target agreed to by governments from US, to China, to India to Australia. If you don’t like political metrics then consider that this is also the target endorsed by hundreds of global corporations from GE to Rio to HSBC.
Acting as late as we are, achieving this target will require us to virtually eliminate CO2 emissions from coal oil and gas within a few decades. This means eliminating whole industries and replacing them, which is where the science meets the market.
Markets are particularly good at challenges like this, using what Austrian economist Joseph Schumpter called “creative destruction”. Markets are unconcerned about collateral damage and friendly fire. They won’t deliver the change steadily or calmly. Markets don’t play politics and will have no regard for sunk capital or prior commitments.
When we act on climate this will be creative destruction on steroids, with the resulting economic storm wreaking havoc and wiping out companies and whole sectors, while creating tomorrow’s new economy and corporate giants. It will be volatile, chaotic and exciting for investors, with fortunes made and lost based on the quality of judgements.
It’s hard to look at today’s politics and investment strategies and accept this analysis. It’s hard to imagine so many people being so wrong. It was also hard to imagine, in 2007, that the world’s governments would nationalise banks and car companies and spend trillions bailing out the financial system. It was hard to imagine, in the USA in 1940, that the coming four years would see military spending go from 1.6 per cent to 37 per cent of GDP and that government would take over and direct the economy, with actions like banning the production of private vehicles. In hindsight, though, such things are always obvious. And with the benefit of hindsight in 10 years time, the coming climate storm will have been obvious as well.
There is only question you have to ask yourself when you see the signals that are now flashing in bright neon lights, screaming “warning, warning, everything is about to change”. Am I ready?
5 Responses to A climate storm for investors
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Archives
- January 2013 (10)
- December 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (2)
- August 2012 (4)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (3)
- May 2012 (2)
- April 2012 (4)
- March 2012 (5)
- February 2012 (6)
- January 2012 (3)
- November 2011 (3)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (2)
- August 2011 (11)
- July 2011 (11)
- June 2011 (5)
- May 2011 (17)
- April 2011 (6)
- March 2011 (5)
- February 2011 (8)
- January 2011 (9)
- December 2010 (8)
- November 2010 (15)
- October 2010 (16)
- September 2010 (6)
- August 2010 (13)
- July 2010 (8)
- June 2010 (26)
- May 2010 (18)
- April 2010 (26)
- March 2010 (42)
- February 2010 (61)
- January 2010 (24)
- December 2009 (43)
- November 2009 (30)
- October 2009 (29)
- September 2009 (36)
- August 2009 (31)
- July 2009 (33)
- June 2009 (23)
- May 2009 (19)
- April 2009 (21)
- March 2009 (19)
- February 2009 (7)
- January 2009 (19)
- December 2008 (20)
- November 2008 (15)
- October 2008 (8)
- September 2008 (13)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (12)
- June 2008 (14)
- May 2008 (17)
- April 2008 (11)
- March 2008 (11)
- February 2008 (16)
- January 2008 (11)
- December 2007 (7)
- November 2007 (18)
- October 2007 (10)
- September 2007 (18)
- August 2007 (25)
- July 2007 (18)
- June 2007 (4)






Paul,
Science has always trumped denial in the long run (eg. cigarettes, ozone depletion, acid rain, etc.)
The problem I see is that it may be too late when considering climate change. When our policymakers finally admit that there is a huge crisis and subsequently put a real price on carbon while promoting renewables, will it already be too late? We are on target for 4C warming by 2100 assuming countries actually follow their proposed emission standards. 4C is catastrophic and yet scientists keep doing their science and speaking “clinically” about climate change while politicans keep “greenwashing” the topic. We need more Dr. James Hansons – the Paul Revere of climate change.
It won’t be too long before the “heat in the pipeline” causes an unstoppable sea level rise. All the legislation in the world cannot stop the sea once the ice melt passes the tipping point.
It’s nice to see so optimistic a piece. For my inspiration I turn to the woods on my small farm. When a tree falls over, a diverse myriad of entrepreneurial organisms take advantage of the additional light, water, nutrients and organic matter. Forests and other ecosystems are resilient, so they can absorb shocks and adapt to change. Although there is healthy competition, the competition is healthy — and many of the best competitors know how to engage in win-wins. It’s fascinating to see that while the actions are those of individual organisms, the totality of the system has evolved in a manner is resilient, resource efficient, and perpetually restorative of the whole. We have much to learn. Not merely technology but in the organizational attributes that make ecosystems (those spared human onslaught)so robust and enduring. I believe science will bear this out as well. Thanks for the great piece.
Henry S. Cole, Ph.D. Publisher Ekos-Squared: http://ecosquared.wordpress.com
It’s nice to see so optimistic a piece. For my inspiration I turn to the woods on my small farm. When a tree falls over, a diverse myriad of entrepreneurial organisms take advantage of the additional light, water, nutrients and organic matter. Forests and other ecosystems are resilient, so they can absorb shocks and adapt to change. Although there is healthy competition, the competition is healthy — and many of the best competitors know how to engage in win-wins. It’s fascinating to see that while the actions are those of individual organisms, the totality of the system has evolved in a manner is resilient, resource efficient, and perpetually restorative of the whole. We have much to learn. Not merely technology but in the organizational attributes that make ecosystems (those spared human onslaught)so robust and enduring. I believe science will bear this out as well. Thanks for the great piece.
Henry S. Cole, Ph.D. Publisher Ekos-Squared
[...] Climate Shifts » Blog Archive » A climate storm for investors [...]
I agree with everything you say; Perhaps you should read this:
http://www.financialpost.com/opinion/columnists/Catastrophism+collapses/3231764/story.html