ABC News, 29th October 2008
A climate change scientist says real estate agents have threatened to make his life difficult if he continues to publish research about how vulnerable particular properties are to rising sea levels and coastal erosion.
Professor Andrew Pitman works at the Climate Change Research Centre at the University of New South Wales.
He says real estate agents do not like potential buyers asking questions about climate change based on his research.
Professor Pitman has told the ABC’s Local Radio that several agents have asked him to stop talking about how vulnerable certain properties are.
“More explicitly [they said] ‘We’re nervous about our particular market niche in a particular suburb’,” he said.
“And, ‘We are going to start making your life difficult if you keep pointing to climate change affecting our particular location’.”
Professor Pitman says he will now change the way he refers to his research even though the science is robust.
“I feel fairly secure in general statements about sea level rise and general statements about properties that are very close to the water being more vulnerable,” he said.
“But I won’t now point to specific locations as being a particularly sensitive, although it’s not very difficult to find out what those [properties] would be.”
He says with an expected 40 per cent rise in sea levels by 2050, properties that are close to the water will be more vulnerable.
Professor Pitman says he suspects the owners of beachfront properties that are at risk, or shoreline properties that are already frequently flooded, already know that they are at risk from rising sea levels.
Tim McKibbon from the Real Estate Institute says it is the first he has heard of agents trying to silence Professor Pitman.
“I have no knowledge of it. He hasn’t named anybody,” he said.
As a result, Mr McKibbon says it is difficult to substantiate the claim, but he is not aware that Professor Pitman’s research is under threat.
One Response to "Estate agents told me not to talk: climate expert"
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Archives
- January 2013 (10)
- December 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (2)
- August 2012 (4)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (3)
- May 2012 (2)
- April 2012 (4)
- March 2012 (5)
- February 2012 (6)
- January 2012 (3)
- November 2011 (3)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (2)
- August 2011 (11)
- July 2011 (11)
- June 2011 (5)
- May 2011 (17)
- April 2011 (6)
- March 2011 (5)
- February 2011 (8)
- January 2011 (9)
- December 2010 (8)
- November 2010 (15)
- October 2010 (16)
- September 2010 (6)
- August 2010 (13)
- July 2010 (8)
- June 2010 (26)
- May 2010 (18)
- April 2010 (26)
- March 2010 (42)
- February 2010 (61)
- January 2010 (24)
- December 2009 (43)
- November 2009 (30)
- October 2009 (29)
- September 2009 (36)
- August 2009 (31)
- July 2009 (33)
- June 2009 (23)
- May 2009 (19)
- April 2009 (21)
- March 2009 (19)
- February 2009 (7)
- January 2009 (19)
- December 2008 (20)
- November 2008 (15)
- October 2008 (8)
- September 2008 (13)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (12)
- June 2008 (14)
- May 2008 (17)
- April 2008 (11)
- March 2008 (11)
- February 2008 (16)
- January 2008 (11)
- December 2007 (7)
- November 2007 (18)
- October 2007 (10)
- September 2007 (18)
- August 2007 (25)
- July 2007 (18)
- June 2007 (4)






It is very clear that there will be substantial sea level rises in the comiing decades. We are likely to see more than the 40 cm currently set as the benchmark for 2050 by the NSW Government.
In the Gosford Region, the Council has sent letters to all property owners with water frontage and with low lying property warning them that the 149 Certificates will carry a note about sea level rise. This is going to impact on sale of property that is vulnerable.
There is however, the ability to enjoy such property for many decades into the future as sea level rise is a slow process. The current benchmarks of 40cm by 2050 and 91 cm by 2100 show how slow the rise will be over the initial few decades. Of course, the rise will accelerate over time and by the time it reaches 1m the rate will be of the order of 20mm per year. And it wont stop there.
That is still a long way off though. We can continue to enjoy our beaches and water front land for a long time yet. If we don’t get silly and invest lots of money in new buildings on such land, we can naturally devalue such property gradually over long years.
Andy Pittman is quite right to give his opinion on the impacts on properties. He knows only too well what the likely impacts are goiing to be and owes it to his community to warn of the dangers. He should not be penalised for this.
Richard