By  and , New York Times, Jan 21 2012

WASHINGTON — President Obama made addressing climate change the most prominent policy vow of his second Inaugural Address on Monday, setting in motion what Democrats say will be a deliberately paced but aggressive campaign built around the use of his executive powers to sidestep Congressional opposition.

“We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that failure to do so would betray our children and future generations,” Mr. Obama said, at the start of eight full sentences on the subject, more than he devoted to any other specific area. “Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires, and crippling drought, and more powerful storms.”

Continue reading »

 

By Neil Plummer (Assistant Director Climate Information Services at Australian Bureau of Meteorology), Blair Trewin (Climatologist, National Climate Centre at Australian Bureau of Meteorology), David Jones (Head of Climate Monitoring and Prediction Services at Australian Bureau of Meteorology), Karl Braganza (Manager, Climate Monitoring Section at Australian Bureau of Meteorology) and Rob Smalley (Climatologist at Australian Bureau of Meteorology)

Australia has started 2013 with a record-breaking heat wave that has lasted more than two weeks across many parts of the country. Temperatures have regularly gone above 48°C, with the highest recorded maximum of 49.6°C at Moomba in South Australia. The extreme conditions have been associated with a delayed onset of the Australian monsoon, and slow moving weather systems over the continent.

Australia has always experienced heat waves, and they are a normal part of most summers. However, the current event affecting much of inland Australia has definitely not been typical.

Continue reading »

 

by CINDY on MARCH 15, 2012 (repost)

4 a.m. Bali, December 2007, the first Tuesday of the two-week UN climate talks. My phone rings, waking me up. Blearily, and a little crossly, I answer it.

I was in Bali to run Greenpeace International’s media for the meeting. The caller was someone called “John” who said he was an intern for a US NGO that I had never heard of. It was a small NGO, he said, who couldn’t come to the meeting, but “john” asked me for a copy of the UNFCCC’s media list for the meeting.

Continue reading »

 

Its a great strategy.  Get it completely wrong in bold type  on your front page, and then, when pushed, make a tiny, hard to notice correction at a later date!

 

By Simon Divecha, University of Adelaide

As Australia stares at “a once-in-20 or 30-year heatwave”, with temperatures over 40 degrees, it is likely that more extreme weather events similar to this are in store for us. The probability of this occurring is well researched. (For example, Professor Barry Brook has previously outlined Adelaide’s situation.)

Australia’s media largely fails to link climate change to the heat. There have been more than 800 articles in the last five days covering the heatwave. Fewer than ten of these also discuss “climate change”, “greenhouse gas”, carbon or “global warming” (from a 3 -7 January 2013 Factiva news source search conducted on 7 January at 4pm).

Continue reading »

 

As The Australian claims sea level rise is not linked to global warming, the world’s most influential climate scientist has called on “sane and rational voices” to speak out and correct the record.

Here is another piece from a journo (Graham Readfearn) who by contrast seems to always get it right!  Murdering Science, the Graham LLoyd way.

Crikey.com.au, January 15, 2012

More than 250 scientists have gathered in Hobart today for a summit of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the UN’s climate science body. The Oz marked the summit’s opening with a front-page “exclusive” story which claimed there was “no link” between sea level rises and global warming.

Continue reading »

 

Updated Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:23pm AEDT

The state is enduring heatwave conditions, with the mercury climbing into the 40s in many inland centres.

Queensland Rail (QR) says passengers travelling on board its Spirit of the Outback train were put onto buses at Emerald this morning to travel west to Longreach.

Continue reading »

 
I have wondered for sometime as to why some newspaper commentators find it hard to get the facts right on climate change (example).  Here is a breakdown by Tristan Edis of yet another piece of poor reporting by News Limited’s The Australian.
Tristan Edis, The Climate Spectator, Jan 7 2012

On December 10 The Australian newspaper ran a front page story entitled, Forget the doom: Coral Reefs will bloom. Following this bold headline came the following four paragraphs:

A WIDESPREAD belief that the world’s coral reefs face a calamitous future due to climate change is proving less resilient than the natural wonders themselves.

(This is a curious statement given that the science stacks up massively in support of the opposite!)

Continue reading »

 

 

By , Washington Post, Jan 2013

What is our little mate Anthony saying about this?
Article:  We await the inevitable “official” announcement from NOAA that 2012 was the warmest year on record in the Lower 48, by a huge margin. Recall, in mid-December Climate Central calculated there was 99.99999999 percent chance this feat would be achieved.

In the mean time, it’s amazing to watch related records stream in at national, regional and local scales.

Figure:  2012 temperatures in the U.S. compared to normal. The only large region where temperatures were slightly cooler than normal was the Pacific Northwest. (High Plains Regional Climate Center)

Continue reading »

 

Here they are from Time Magazine (Top 10 Green Stories):

1. The Great Midwest Drought

By  Dec. 04, 2012

Danny Wilcox Frazier for TIME

DANNY WILCOX FRAZIER FOR TIME

Drought is the slow-motion natural disaster—the kind that’s easy to overlook as it’s happening—but what hit the U.S. corn belt this summer was so historic that it was impossible to miss. As of mid-October, nearly three-fourths of the U.S. was in some state of drought, and the extreme dryness took a terrible toll on crops. Corn yield per acre is on track to be down 25% below normal, while soybean yields are down by 14%. Approximately 2,500 counties nationwide had to receive some form of disaster relief because of the drought, which is likely to cause retail food prices to rise 3 to 4% next year. Worst of all, the climate change problem is only getting worse, so this year’s drought may just be a taste of what a warmer world has in store for the American breadbasket.

Read more: http://science.time.com/2012/12/04/top-10-science-lists/#ixzz2E92TGkrb

2. The Battle to Label GM Foods

By  Dec. 04, 20120
ROBYN BECK  / Getty Images
ROBYN BECK / GETTY IMAGES

Genetically modified crops are everywhere in the U.S.—some 85% of corn, the staple crop in the U.S. food system, is genetically modified. Though mainstream scientific research says that GM foods are harmless, a growing number of environmentalists still view them with suspicion. Hence California’s Proposition 37,  on the ballot in November,  which would have required the labeling of all foods made with genetically modified ingredients. Though the pro-Prop 37 forces—led by prominent food writers like Michael Pollan—held an early advantage, the proposition ended up losing, thanks in part to tens of millions of dollars in campaign spending by agricultural companies like Monsanto.

Read more: http://science.time.com/2012/12/04/top-10-science-lists/#ixzz2E92cor9L

3. California Puts a Cap on Carbon

By  Dec. 04, 20120

Getty ImagesGETTY IMAGES

Cap and trade died an ignominious death in the U.S. Senate in 2010, when proponents were unable to bust a Republican-led filibuster threat. Even after President Obama’s re-election, federal climate action still seems like a long shot. But ultra-green California is a different story. Six years ago, the state legislature passed Assembly Bill 32, designed to establish a statewide cap on carbon emissions from industry. After years of legislative wrangling and one failed ballot challenge in 2010, the law was at last set to go into effect at the end of 2012. Businesses will need to figure out how to reduce their carbon emissions gradually over the coming decade—and if AB32 is successful without crippling California’s economy, it could pave the way for real federal action on global

Read more: http://science.time.com/2012/12/04/top-10-science-lists/#ixzz2E92nZ7wz

4. The U.S. Oil Boom

By  Dec. 04, 20120
Matthew Staver/Bloomberg via Getty Images
MATTHEW STAVER/BLOOMBERG VIA GETTY IMAGES

Every U.S. President since Richard Nixon has promised to get America off foreign oil—and yet, American dependence on imported crude only seemed to grow. But in 2012 that changed definitively. Thanks in part to new sources of shale oil in North Dakota and Texas—as well as conservation efforts to reduce oil consumption—the U.S. has enjoyed a major domestic oil boom. By November the country was producing 6.68 million barrels of oil a day, the highest level in 18 years—enough to make it a net exporter of petroleum products. By some estimates, the U.S. might eventually overtake Saudi Arabia as the world’s biggest oil producer. But the boom has its dark side—shale drilling requires hydrofracking, which may pollute local water supplies.

5. The Battle Over Keystone XL

By  Dec. 04, 20121 Comment
Tom Pennington / Getty Images
TOM PENNINGTON / GETTY IMAGES

The domestic oil boom in the U.S. is getting a big boost from a major new supply of crude imported from the friendly neighboring nation north of the border. But Canadian crude from the oil sands of Alberta—or tar sands, as environmentalists call it—also comes with a heavy environmental cost, both in terms of local water pollution and greater carbon emissions. That led greens to oppose the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, which would have transported hundreds of thousands of barrels of oil sands crude down to the U.S. At the same time, Republicans—and more conservative Democrats—were pushing for the pipeline as another step towards continental energy independence. In the end, President Obama decided to block the project temporarily—but with re-election assured, he may take a second look at Keystone.

6. Arctic Sea Ice Melts to Record Low Levels

By  Dec. 04, 2012Add a Comment
Ice on black sands, Breidarmerkurfjara beach
GETTY IMAGES

Climate change has always happened faster in the Arctic than anywhere else,partly because of a sort of accelerating feedback loop. Reflective ice absorbs less heat than dark sea water, so as ice cover gets smaller and smaller, the water gets warmer and warmer. But what happened to the North Pole in 2012 was record-breaking. Arctic sea ice—the ever-changing cap over the top of the globe—melted this summer to just 1.32 million sq. miles (3.41 sq. km), the lowest level since satellite records began in 1979. This year’s minimum extent is 50% smaller than the average between 1979 and 2000. And the melting is unlikely to stop—scientists believe that the Arctic itself could be ice-free during the summer as early as the end of the decade.  That has an additional effect on warming—white sea ice reflects sunlight back into space, while dark open water absorbs it, further speeding global warming in a feedback process.

7. 2012 on Track to Be the Warmest Year on Record

By  Dec. 04, 2012Add a Comment
Paul Sancya / AP
PAUL SANCYA / AP

Climate change is going to have a number of unpredictable effects, but here’s we know: it’s going to keep getting warmer. We saw that in 2012, which is on track to be the hottest year globally on record, going back well into the 19th century. The winter was particularly hot—normally snowbound parts of the U.S. like Minnesota and North Dakota experienced days of mild temperatures. By the summertime, it was miserable—July was the hottest single month ever in the U.S., which only intensified an unusually brutal drought. The year just past will almost certainly be a record-breaking year—but don’t expect that record to stay unbroken for long.

 

8. Climate Change Goes Missing in the 2012 Election

By  Dec. 04, 2012 Add a Comment
Carolyn Kaster / AP
CAROLYN KASTER / AP

Evidence of global warming was everywhere in 2012—except for the Presidential election. During the campaign, climate change virtually disappeared as an active issue, with Republican Mitt Romney mocking even the suggestion of climate action, while Democrat Barack Obama mostly ignored it. That was chiefly due to the bad economy, which sucked up most of the campaign season’s energy and voter attention. But it was also a mark of how politically polarized climate has become in national politics—and a sign of just how difficult it will be to get the momentum needed to do something at last about what might be the problem facing humankind.

 

9. Offshore Oil Drilling Begins in the Arctic

By  Dec. 04, 2012 1 Comment
Getty Images
GETTY IMAGES

The record melting of Arctic sea ice wasn’t just a sign that climate change was real and happening. It was also an opportunity—ironically, for the very companies responsible for much of that warming. This September, with the blessing of the Obama Administration, Shell began drilling an offshore oil well about 70 miles (113 km) off Alaska’s northern coast. The effort quickly hit a snag: ice in the water led Shell to suspend the operation until the summer of 2013. But make no mistake—there are billions of barrels of oil in those Arctic waters, and the drilling ships will be back. Given the damage a spill could do in the remote and bitterly cold waters of the Arctic, that scares environmentalists.

 

10. Superstorm Sandy Brings Climate Change Home

By  Dec. 04, 20121  Comment

 

top10_greentrends__sandy
CHRISTOS PATHIAKIS / GETTY IMAGES

No, we can’t say exactly how much responsibility man-made global warming bears for the massive storm that slammed into the Northeast at the end of the October, killing over 100, flooding chunks of New York City and leaving more than 8 million people without power. But we do know that climate change—especially because of rising sea levels—is likely to make the Sandys of the future that much more dangerous. One thing should be clear: with nearly 4 million Americans living within a few feet of high tide, we need to better prepare our coastal cities for the storms to come.

A BUSY YEAR!  Read more: http://science.time.com/2012/12/04/top-10-science-lists/#ixzz2E94fczW2

 
Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.